Combination Therapies Using Metformin and/or Valproic Acid in Prostate Cancer: Possible Mechanistic Interactions.

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent cancer in men. The evolution from local PCa to castration-resistant PCa, an end-stage of disease, is often associated with changes in genes such as p53, androgen receptor, PTEN, and ETS gene fusion products. Evidence is accumulating that repurposing of metformin (MET) and valproic acid (VPA) either when used alone, or in combination, with another therapy, could potentially play a role in slowing down PCa progression. This review provides an overview of the application of MET and VPA, both alone and in combination with other drugs for PCa treatment, correlates the responses to these drugs with common molecular changes in PCa, and then describes the potential for combined MET and VPA as a systemic therapy for prostate cancer, based on potential interacting mechanisms.

The Combination of Metformin and Valproic Acid Has a Greater Anti-tumoral Effect on Prostate Cancer Growth In Vivo than Either Drug Alone.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The hypoglycemic drug metformin (MET) and the anti-epileptic drug valproic acid (VPA) have individually shown anti-tumor effects in prostate cancer in vitro. The present study intended to investigate the efficacy of the combination of MET and VPA in prostate cancer treatment in a pre-clinical xenograft model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP and PC-3) were inoculated under the skin of BALB/c nude mice. The mice were treated with 200 µl/ml MET and/or 0.4% (w/v) VPA diluted in drinking water, or with vehicle control, and were monitored until the tumor volume reached 2,000 mm3 Evaluation of toxicity of the drug combination was determined in liver and kidney by histology. RESULTS: In both LNCaP and PC-3 xenografts, MET combined with VPA significantly reduced tumor growth during the first 4 weeks following treatment, and delayed the time-to-tumor volume of 2,000 mm3 by 90 days, as compared to MET or to VPA alone, and to vehicle control. There was no significant difference in total mouse weight, liver or kidney morphology in response to combination treatment (MET+VPA) compared to MET or VPA alone and vehicle control. CONCLUSION: The combination treatment of MET with VPA is more effective at slowing prostate tumor growth in vivo compared to either drug alone, in mouse xenografts. These pre-clinical results support previous in vitro data and also demonstrate the low toxicity of the combination of these drugs, suggesting that this may be a potential new therapy to be investigated in clinical trials for prostate cancer.

Chronic low dose ethanol induces an aggressive metastatic phenotype in TRAMP mice, which is counteracted by parthenolide.

Despite advances in prostate cancer therapy, dissemination and growth of metastases results in shortened survival. Here we examined the potential anti-cancer effect of the NF-κB inhibitor parthenolide (PTL) and its water soluble analogue dimethylaminoparthenolide (DMAPT) on tumour progression and metastasis in the TRansgenic Adenocarcinoma of the Mouse Prostate (TRAMP) model of prostate cancer. Six-week-old male TRAMP mice received PTL (40 mg/kg in 10% ethanol/saline), DMAPT (100 mg/kg in sterile water), or vehicle controls by oral gavage thrice weekly until palpable tumour formation. DMAPT treatment slowed normal tumour development in TRAMP mice, extending the time-to-palpable prostate tumour by 20%. PTL did not slow overall tumour development, while the ethanol/saline vehicle used to administer PTL unexpectedly induced an aggressive metastatic tumour phenotype. Chronic ethanol/saline vehicle upregulated expression of NF-κB, MMP2, integrin ß1, collagen IV, and laminin, and induced vascular basement membrane degradation in primary prostate tumours, as well as increased metastatic spread to the lung and liver. All of these changes were largely prevented by co-administration with PTL. DMAPT (in water) reduced metastasis to below that of water-control. These data suggest that DMAPT has the potential to be used as a cancer preventive and anti-metastatic therapy for prostate cancer. Although low levels of ethanol consumption have not been shown to strongly correlate with prostate cancer epidemiology, these results would support a potential effect of chronic low dose ethanol on metastasis and the TRAMP model provides a useful system in which to further explore the mechanisms involved.

The Combination of Metformin and Valproic Acid Induces Synergistic Apoptosis in the Presence of p53 and Androgen Signaling in Prostate Cancer.

We investigated the potential of combining the hypoglycemic drug metformin (MET) and the antiepileptic drug valproic acid (VPA), which act via different biochemical pathways, to provide enhanced antitumor responses in prostate cancer. Prostate cancer cell lines (LNCaP and PC-3), normal prostate epithelial cells (PrEC), and patient-derived prostate tumor explants were treated with MET and/or VPA. Proliferation and apoptosis were assessed. The role of p53 in response to MET + VPA was assessed in cell lines using RNAi in LNCaP (p53+) and ectopic expression of p53 in PC-3 (p53-). The role of the androgen receptor (AR) was investigated using the AR antagonist enzalutamide. The combination of MET and VPA synergistically inhibited proliferation in LNCaP and PC-3, with no significant effect in PrEC. LNCaP, but not PC-3, demonstrated synergistic intrinsic apoptosis in response to MET + VPA. Knockdown of p53 in LNCaP (p53+, AR+) reduced the synergistic apoptotic response as did inhibition of AR. Ectopic expression of p53 in PC-3 (p53-, AR-) increased apoptosis in response to MET + VPA. In patient-derived prostate tumor explants, MET + VPA also induced a significant decrease in proliferation and an increase in apoptosis in tumor cells. In conclusion, we demonstrate that MET + VPA can synergistically kill more prostate cancer cells than either drug alone. The response is dependent on the presence of p53 and AR signaling, which have critical roles in prostate carcinogenesis. Further in vivo/ex vivo preclinical studies are required to determine the relative efficacy of MET + VPA as a potential treatment for prostate cancer. Mol Cancer Ther; 16(12); 2689-700. ©2017 AACR.